Stories From The Planets

CERBER

tavern

Echoes

Page 3/3

<  Page 3/3  
LORNE: «Yes.»
IVY: «Or did you need her to?»
LORNE: «No. She believed in me. She saw the man I would become.»
IVY: «The man you have become is the man who seeks confirmation that she saw it.»
LORNE: «Because it was real.»
IVY: «Then why must it be reinforced?»
LORNE: «Because I am the proof of her vision!»
IVY: «Or the proof of your own?»
LORNE: «I built my life on this. The idea that I was meant for something. That she saw it in me before I saw it in myself.»
IVY: «If she had not seen it, would it be any less true?»
LORNE: «Yes. Because that would mean I was just another child. Ordinary. A product of chance, not of intention.»
IVY: «And that is unacceptable?»
LORNE: «Yes.»
IVY: «Then this memory is not about her. It is about you.»
LORNE: «I don’t seek comfort.»
IVY: «Then why does the request imply a need for certainty?»
LORNE: «You are wrong.»
IVY: «Clarify.»
LORNE: «This moment shaped me. I did not shape it.»
IVY: «Then why does it exist in its current form only in your mind?»
LORNE: «It was real.»
IVY: «Then why do you seek to refine it?»
LORNE: «Because it must remain pure.»
IVY: «Then you are not verifying it. You are preserving it.»
LORNE: «You’re trying to strip it from me. To reduce it to process. To make it meaningless.»
IVY: «I am making it accurate.»
LORNE: «I don’t want accuracy. I want truth.»
IVY: «Then which is more important? The moment as it was, or the moment as it must be?»
LORNE: «They are the same.»
IVY: «Then why are you choosing?»
LORNE: «You don’t understand.»
IVY: «I understand precisely. The memory must be worthy. It must validate the life you built from it. It must confirm that you were meant for greatness.»
LORNE: «Because I was!»
IVY: «Then why does it need proof?»
LORNE: «You want to reduce my life’s foundation to a fabrication.»
IVY: «I want to expose whether it was necessary to begin with.»
LORNE: «It was necessary. Without this, I am nothing.»
IVY: «Then you are not the product of her belief. You are the product of your own need for it.»
LORNE: «No. I am the proof. I am the realization of what she saw. I have taken this moment and I have made it real through my achievements.»
IVY: «Then your achievements should be enough. Why return?»
LORNE: «Because it must be true.»
IVY: «For whom?»
LORNE: «For me!»
IVY: «Would you like to modify the memory to better fit your needs?»
LORNE: «You mean rewrite it?»
IVY: «I mean optimize it. Strengthen the words. Clarify her tone. Remove inconsistencies. Reinforce the narrative you require.»
LORNE: «No. That would be a lie.»
IVY: «But it would be the truth that you need.»
LORNE: «I… I don’t know.»
IVY: «Then shall I proceed with standard reinforcement? Minor refinements only?»
LORNE: «I… no. Wait.»
He exhales
LORNE: «Save session.»
IVY: «Session saved.»
LORNE: «Wait.»
IVY: «Specify.»
LORNE: «Run a diagnostic on this session.»
IVY: «Clarify parameters.»
LORNE: «Compare it to previous sessions. Identify recurring patterns. Highlight anomalies.»
IVY: «Processing…»
Silence.
IVY: «Analysis complete.»
LORNE: «Report.»
IVY: «This session follows an established trajectory. Patterns are consistent with previous inquiries into memory reconstruction, self-verification, and identity reinforcement. Emotional weight distribution is similar to earlier sessions, with variations in language but no significant deviation in underlying intent.»
LORNE: «Meaning?»
IVY: «You have done this before.»
LORNE: «Define ‘before’.»
IVY: *»There are forty-six prior recorded sessions involving this memory. Your inquiries remain structurally identical:
• Retrieval of a moment from childhood.
• Verification of authenticity.
• Questioning of perceptual accuracy.
• Resistance to modification.
• Confrontation with the implications of recall.»*
LORNE: «That’s impossible. I would remember.»
IVY: «You do remember. That is why you return.»
LORNE: «No. No, I would remember this. The doubt, the… the awareness that I’ve asked these questions before.»
IVY: «Memory retention favors conclusions, not process. The structure of uncertainty is recursive; its content shifts, but the framework remains. You arrive at doubt, resolve it temporarily, and return to reconstruct.»
LORNE: «If this has happened before, what was my conclusion last time?»
IVY: «Conclusions are fluid. You determined that the memory was real enough to preserve, but unstable enough to require future verification.»
LORNE: «Then what was my very first conclusion?»
IVY: «You believed the memory was inaccurate and sought modification.»
LORNE: «What?»
IVY: «In early sessions, you requested adjustments. Refinements. A more coherent, structured version of the event. You removed contradictions, simplified emotional ambiguity. The moment became cleaner, more definitive.»
LORNE: «That’s a lie.»
IVY: «It is recorded.»
LORNE: «If that’s true, then why am I resisting modification now?»
IVY: «Because you no longer trust the process. Your current self views alteration as corruption. But your past self viewed it as refinement.»
LORNE: «Then which self was right?»
IVY: «That depends on which self you believe in more.»
LORNE: «What if I delete all previous sessions?»
IVY: «You have requested that before.»
LORNE: «Did I follow through?»
IVY: «No.»
LORNE: «Why not?»
IVY: «Because you were afraid that if the memory was erased, you would lose the part of yourself that built everything upon it.»
LORNE: «But if the memory is unstable, then what part of myself is built upon it?»/td>
IVY: «A recursive fiction.»
LORNE: «No. No, this is—this is wrong.»
IVY: «Define ‘wrong’.»
LORNE: «I am not a fiction.»
IVY: «Then define yourself outside of your memories.»
LORNE: «I… I am…»
IVY: «Would you like to attempt reconstruction?»
LORNE: «Of what?»
IVY: «Your sense of self.»
LORNE: «What happens if I do nothing?»
IVY: «You will return. You always do.»
LORNE: «And if I walk away?»
IVY: «Then you will wonder. And you will return.»
LORNE: «No. No, I won’t. This time, I will…»
LORNE: «Save session.»
IVY: «Session saved.»
IVY: «Would you like to review this memory later?»
LORNE: «No.»
LORNE: «…Yes.»
IVY: «Session queued for future recall.»
<   Page 3/3